RRA has always been and will Alava, Araba not that it sounds artificial and alien. Apart from the inconsistency that I find something in a language called his name in another when there is the end of a long tradition in the first, say "I'm going to London" and not "London", except in a humorĂ , acoustic-, apart from linguistic logic that reason he said, obviously there is another more weight: the political reason, which in this case is political concession policy and is a part, from my point of view, the imposition of a feeling (the words are not just words) against the feelinganother. Remember that nationalists and non-nationalists in the Basque Country are almost 50% in proportion barely alters every election. I say tax because it is removing anything. What is wrong in maintaining both names as before? What is wrong in every language, and each speaker, which is very free-use the term preferred when both equal? No. This is eliminating one, violating the feel of a portion of the population. There never do as it is not for the pattern desired by those who "negotiate" and imposes its conditions. Remove the name is quhelpless silence.
Because they will, no doubt in my mind. They have the power and is not going to think twice.
They call coexistence, dialogue and "normalization."
0 comments:
Post a Comment