Wolf Off White Comic Book 41 th entry: analysis / human beings, cruel nature.

rights that lead to degradation are the main element of fun involved.

The cruelty is considered as wrong by all means, we have examples of cruelty throughout human history, as an example are the Crusades, World War II ... Any war itself ... Until God himself turns out to be a sadistic bastard throughout history, who lives to punish and to see suffer, why? Simply by seeing people suffer or their "enemies"

[1]

. C HTMLXC

hypocrite is also considered immune to enjoy the misery of another, the difference is the extent to which we find it graceful. The industry actually humor revolves around the misfortunes of another, but always in a low magnitude (which is what makes it fun). However if we look at the levels of cruelty of any war or serious conflict, it is clear that the fun level is much lower, in which case to find fun, as one might speak of a pathology of the individual. is why we say that man is inherently cruel, cruelty and essence are inseparable duality. But always the difference will be defined by the extent of it and how you enjoy.

[1]

This human behavior as a god is another evidence that God does not exist (the least as we do see), a creation of man.

Making Earrings Out Of Testicles

Revenge primarily consists of the reprimand against a person or group in response to a perceived wrongdoing. Although many aspects of revenge resemble the concept of justice, revenge usually pursues a goal rather insulting to sleep. The desire for revenge is forcing anyone who has done wrong to suffer the same pain he inflicted, or ensure that this person or group will never again commit such damages [1] .

;

By definition, the Revenge is a hotly contested topic in philosophy. Some feel that after all, the threat of retaliation is necessary to maintain a just society. In some societies, it is believed that the injury inflicted in revenge should be greater than the injury that originated as a punishment. The philosophy of the Old Testament "eye for an eye" (Exodus 21:24) is to limit the damage possible, in order to avoid a vendetta or series of violent acts that may lose control (try to match the suffering). Detractors argue that revenge is a simple logical error of the same type that "two wrong make a right." Some Christians interpretan through the apostle Paul, that God alone has the moral right to a fair revenge. In fact, every religious system contains some form of mediation of disputes and the limitation of vengeance, giving a sense of cosmic justice to replace the often faulty justice system for men.

In ancient societies, particularly those with weak central justice systems, the method for deterring murder was to allow the family to avenge the slain murderer. However, if the families of the murdered murderer and the murder disagreedC In Japan's feudal past the Samurai class held the honor of the family, clan, or his Lord, through the vengeful murder or 'katakiuchi'. These killings could also involve the offender's family. Today, katakiuchi is generally carried out peacefully, but revenge remains an important part of Japanese culture.

The goal of some legal systems is limited to "just" revenge.

modern Western legal system usually sets a target of reform or rehabilitation of the perpetrator of a crime or criminal act. Even in these systems, however, society is conceived as a victim of criminal actions, and the revenge of such acts is an important part of the concept of justice - a criminal "pays his debt to society."

Interestingly, psychologists have found that the frustrated psychological expectation of revenge may lead to victimization.

The proverb "revenge is a dish best served cold" comes from an eighteenth-century novel entitled "Les Liaisons Dangereuses," written by the French official and army general Pierre Choderlos de Laclos.

In conlusión, we can define that .... Matters in the end nobody will read ...

[1]

Dictionary

the Royal English Language .

Playas Nidistas En San Francisco 39 th entry: Analysis / The root of the problems

The man by nature seeks instability, which is why the problems that are involved most often a consequence of their own volition.

People often make assumptions about what life would be if they had no problems, wonder why they have so many problems and they can not get away from them.

The answer is simple: most if not all the problems people have are subject to propia decision of the person is the person who seeks such problems, perhaps not so aware of everything, probably due to a temporary deactivation of the frontal lobe (the trial), but in essence, the responsibility for the problem, having been involved in circumstances conducive to the problem. But the real reason, that people look for issues that affect them is looking for an imbalance in your life. People, like everything in nature, required to generate a slight imbalance in order to remain in operation.

the person consents or unconsciouslys know the consequences and outcomes of engaging in an appropriate range of situations, it is totally false that they do not know at all what they were doing or what they wanted to achieve.

If we look at a group of people, we could take the younger sector, who are most likely to be involved in problems (severe sometimes or unimportant), the answer to why this behavior, unlike some people adult or child, is that due to the large number of hormones that is released due to development problems serve as a catalystXC